How Does Video Outreach Impact Pork Consumption (Faunalytics)
A study conducted by Faunalytics and Animal Equality supports the effectiveness of Animal Equality’s video outreach for reducing consumption and shifting attitudes. Over 3,000 people on U.S. college campuses participated in a randomized controlled trial. Participants either watched a video about pig factory farming (on a tablet or via a VR headset) or did not watch a video (the control group).
Compared to the control condition, participants who watched either video had stronger anti-pork attitudes immediately after watching and one month later. The videos also had the desired effect on pork consumption: relative to the control condition, participants who saw one of the videos ate marginally less pork. For example, 38% of people who watched the 360-degree VR video and 37% who watched the 2D video said they hadn’t eaten any pork in the last month, versus 33% in the control group. The results suggest that watching a video about farmed pigs makes the average person’s attitudes more anti-pork, and that attitude shift leads them to reduce their pork consumption.
AI suggested related articles
- Citations/Effectiveness of a theory-informed documentary to reduce consumption of meat and animal products- three randomized controlled experiments (Rethink Priorities) (0.75)
- Citations/Reduce Or Go Veg - Effects On Meal Choice (Faunalytics) (0.74)
- Citations/Animal Equality showed that advocating for diet change works But is it cost-effective (Rethink Priorities) (0.73)